<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tor on Whistleblowing Software</title><link>https://whistleblowing-software.pages.dev/tags/tor/</link><description>Recent content in Tor on Whistleblowing Software</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://whistleblowing-software.pages.dev/tags/tor/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Anonymity vs Confidentiality: a Whistleblowing Threat Model</title><link>https://whistleblowing-software.pages.dev/posts/anonymity-vs-confidentiality-whistleblowing-threat-model/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://whistleblowing-software.pages.dev/posts/anonymity-vs-confidentiality-whistleblowing-threat-model/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Anonymity and confidentiality are two different security properties, and a whistleblowing platform that uses them as synonyms is selling a promise it cannot keep. Anonymity means the reporter&amp;rsquo;s identity stays unobservable to the platform, to intermediaries, and to recipients, which operationally requires a &lt;a href="https://www.torproject.org/"&gt;Tor&lt;/a&gt; onion service v3, the Tor Browser on the reporter&amp;rsquo;s side, and reporter-side discipline against forensic traces. Confidentiality means the reporter accesses the platform over a regular browser; the ISP, the employer network, or a CDN can log the connection, while the platform encrypts the content, restricts recipient access, and keeps logs honest. Both are valid, and the right default depends on context: corporate compliance programmes usually default to confidential with anonymous opt-in via Tor, whereas human-rights initiatives and investigative newsrooms default to anonymous.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>